Legal Opinion

Zaragoza v. Ibarra

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 2009No. G040242PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

This appeal arises out of a common scenario: A worker hired by an unlicensed contractor on a home remodeling project is injured while working on the job. When the worker has worked less than 52 hours in the 90 days prior to the accident, the law is clear that any claim the worker has against the homeowner for the injury is outside the workers’ compensation system. However, the worker may bring a claim against the homeowner in simple negligence, if there is any.

In this case, however, undisputed facts show that there wasn’t any negligence. The worker’s injury was entirely his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. King v. LennenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ramirez v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vebr v. CulpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Jones v. Sorenson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Cortez v. AbichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API