Legal Opinion

Vebr v. Culp

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 2015No. G050730PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Tomas Vebr was employed by a painting contractor which contracted with defendants Gary A. Culp and Georgia M. Culp 1 to paint the interior of their home. An hour into working in the Culps’ home, Vebr fell 12 to 15 feet from an extension ladder provided by the painting contractor and was injured. Vebr sued the Culps for negligence and premises liability based on allegations that his fellow painters were negligent. The trial court granted the Culps’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

The painting contractor claimed a no-employee exemption from the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Sorenson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Borrello v. Respironics California, LLC (P)District Court, S.D. California · 2024
  3. Borrello v. Respironics California, LLC (P)District Court, S.D. California · 2023
  4. Jones v. SorensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API