Legal Opinion
Junker v. Eddings
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 8, 2005No. 2004-1208PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
In this design patent infringement case, the jury, answering interrogatories, found that the patent was valid and willfully infringed, and awarded damages of $813,550 for the. infringement, but denied damages for breach of a non-disclosure agreement. The district. court denied judgment as- a matter of law for the defendants, refused to . establish a constructive trust for the patentee’s benefit, and awarded the paten-tee, attorney fees. Junker v. Eddings, No. 3:02-CV-0172-M (N.D.Tex. Jan. 16, 2004) (“Amended Judgment”). We affirm all of those actions, except the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stewart v. BaseyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lumen View Technology LLC v. Findthebest.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Aero Products International, Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Gordon v. PETE'S AUTO SERVICE OF DENBIGH, INC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- TruePosition Inc. v. ANDREW CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Saint-Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.