Stewart v. Basey
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman
The controlling question in this case is whether the language quoted below stipulating the damages recoverable for the breach of a lease contract is a provision for liquidated damages or for a penalty. The trial court construed it as a provision for a penalty and, finding that the lessor suffered no damages by lessee’s breach except $38.50 caused by the destruction of a partition door in one of the leased buildings, rendered judgment for that amount only. The Court of Civil Appeals upheld the trial court in its refusal to award liquidated damages, but reversed that portion of the judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Durst v. SwiftTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Palestine Ice, Fuel & Gin Co. v. Walter Connally & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Stewart v. BaseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Langever v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Berry-HelfandTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Abraxas Petroleum Corp. v. Hornburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- Zachry Construction Corporation v. Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Walden v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.