Legal Opinion
Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 27, 1983No. Appeal 83-978PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the April 8, .1983, judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, 219 USPQ 878, sitting without a jury, holding appellee, Central Soya Company, Inc. (Central Soya) entitled to recover from appellant, Geo. A. Hormel & Company (Hormel) $100,000.00 in attorney fees, $29,-000. 00.in expenses, $152,980.00 in compensatory damages, which were doubled to $305,-964.00, and 6% interest on the compensatory damages in the amount of $41,116.93.
This determination followed the May 19, 1981, decision of the Tenth Circuit Court of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.