Legal Opinion
Geib v. Haynes Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 5, 1932No. 28,909PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover agreed compensation as an engineering salesman for the defendants. There was judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appealed.
The matter of importance is the construction of certain written contracts of employment between the defendants and the plain tiff. They were in print, involved in language and arrangement, in type of different sizes, and'were the creation of the defendants. They were form contracts dealing, with considerable circumstance and not always with certainty, with situations which might arise. In such case the rule is that if there be ambiguity or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dutcher v. DutcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- John v. TimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Lucas v. Ganley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Mt. Vernon Refrigerating Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Smith v. . HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wick v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Buckey v. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Podany v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Wallace v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Daltex Inc. v. WESTERN OIL & FUEL COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.