Legal Opinion

Stoner v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1965No. 16458PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

The appellant Jack V. Stoner sued appel-lee City of Dallas for damages to his home resulting from the alleged diversion of flood waters of South Ash Creek, which flows adjacent to his home. The trial court sustained the appellee’s motion to dismiss the suit on the ground that the petition failed to state a cause of action. The appellant pitched his suit upon the alleged violation by appellee of Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. Art. 7589a, which provides in part:

“It shall hereafter be unlawful for any person, firm or private corporation to divert the natural flow of the surface waters in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoefs v. ShortTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. O'Connell v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Cairo, V. & C. Ry. Co. v. BrevoortU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1894
  4. International & Great Northern Railroad v. ReaganTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Sullivan v. DooleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dalon v. City of DeSoto, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. Ford Motor Company v. Dallas Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. City of Princeton v. Abbott, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. City of Keller v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. In Re Adjudication of Water Rights of the Lower Guadalupe River Segment, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API