Legal Opinion
Akers v. Beal Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 11, 2011No. Civil Action 09-0724 (RMU)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Without Prejudice the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Denying the Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Plaintiff’s July 8, 2010 Declaration
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss based on the pro se plaintiffs failure to participate in discovery and adequately prosecute her case. In opposing that motion, the plaintiff has filed a supplemental declaration, which the defendants have moved to strike. For the following reasons, the court denies both of the defendants’ motions.
II. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Weisberg v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Schmidt v. ShahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Wada v. United States Secret ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
3Cited by36 opinions
- Glass v. LaHoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Crummey v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Nix El v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.