State ex rel. Fornoff v. Sargent
New Mexico Supreme Court
Brief for Respondent and Appellant. Mounted Police Department created. Laws 1905, ch. 9- Amended by Laws 1909 ch, 127. Chap. 108, see. 12, Laws 1903; sec. 28, ch. 89, Laws-1907, and sec. 11, chap. 127, Laws 1909, not applicable because every legislature has passed a general appropriation bill. Appropriation made by legislature for the Mounted Police in 1912, ending December 1, 1913. No provision made since that time. Brief for Petitioner and Appellee.
Read the full summary
Brief for Respondent and Appellant. Mounted Police Department created. Laws 1905, ch. 9- Amended by Laws 1909 ch, 127. Chap. 108, see. 12, Laws 1903; sec. 28, ch. 89, Laws-1907, and sec. 11, chap. 127, Laws 1909, not applicable because every legislature has passed a general appropriation bill. Appropriation made by legislature for the Mounted Police in 1912, ending December 1, 1913. No provision made since that time. Brief for Petitioner and Appellee. Chap. 9, Laws 1905, as amended by sec. 4, ch. 127, Laws--1909, constitute a continuing appropriation and it is immaterial whether the…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT.
HANNA, J. —
The first error assigned is predicated upon the action of the District Judge in sustaining the demurrer to the answer.
By the act of 1905, (chap. 9) providing for the organization and equipment of the Mounted Police, it was provided that the Governor be authorized to muster into service one company of police, to consist of one Captain, who-should receive $2000.00 per annum as salary; one Lieutenant at $1500.00 per annum; one Sergeant at $1200.00 per annum, and not more than eight privates at $900.00 per annum.
After providing for the equipment and duties of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Minis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Thomas v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ristine v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of the Sinking FundIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crawford v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Edwards v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Windes v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Gamble v. VelardeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
- Dorman v. SargentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.