Gamble v. Velarde
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
This is an original action in mandamus to compel the state auditor to issue a warrant upon the special suspense fund in the state treasury, for payment of plaintiff’s claim, approved by the state comptroller, for refund of the excise tax collected upon sales of gasoline used otherwise then in motor vehicles operated on the public highways. L. 1931, c. 31.
The cause is before us upon an alternative writ, an answer, and a stipulation of facts. Questions of law only are presented. The most important is whether defendant may issue the warrant without violating N. M. Const, art. 4, § 30: “Except…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Edwards v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Colbert v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- California Toll Bridge Authority v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Holmes v. State Board of FinanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Mills v. WilderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. HartmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.