Legal Opinion
Aracely v. Nielsen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 3, 2018No. Civil Action No.: 17–1976 (RC)PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION APPLICATION AND EXHIBITS; AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
Every day, individuals fleeing persecution and violence in their home countries seek asylum within our borders. And every day, United States immigration officials must determine whether to admit these individuals or reject them. This case concerns what happens to these individuals while their requests for asylum are…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Jamal A. v. WhitakerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Lett v. DeckerDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- AL Otro Lado, Inc. v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Poonjani v. ShanahanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Jacinto-Castanon De Nolasco v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.