Sahafzadeh-Taeb v. Taeb (In re Sahafzadeh-Taeb)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtBanke, J.
*128Appellant Hamid Taeb and his attorney Michelle Trigger appeal from a *613Code of Civil Procedure section 128.51 sanctions order, issued after Trigger failed to appear for trial in this dissolution case. We reverse as to Taeb and affirm as to Trigger.
We publish this opinion to make explicit that no vestige remains of the holdings in San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San Diego (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 1306, 203 Cal.Rptr.3d 34 ( San Diegans ) concerning the requirements of section 128.5. Among other things, San Diegans held that an objective standard applies when determining whether a party's…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Summers v. City of Cathedral CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Catlin Ins. Co. v. Danko Meredith Law FirmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Marriage of D'Souza CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Mora v. MenjivarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Smith v. Hunt & Henriques CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Valenti v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023