Legal Opinion

Catlin Ins. Co. v. Danko Meredith Law Firm

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 2022No. A160358Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/11/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CATLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, A160358 v. (San Mateo County DANKO MEREDITH LAW FIRM, INC., Super. Ct. No. 20CIV00107) et al., Defendants and Appellants. I. INTRODUCTION These consolidated appeals present a narrow question of civil procedure: When (1) a defendant files an anti-SLAPP motion that explicitly defers a request for fees to a separate, subsequent motion, and (2) the plaintiff files a voluntary dismissal, thus mooting the entire…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API