Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. Reedy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1963No. 40219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Defendants in error instituted this action to recover damages from plaintiffs in error. Hereinafter reference to the parties will be made as in the trial court. Plaintiffs, for their cause of action, alleged that defendants, while spraying certain lands adjoining those of plaintiffs with pesticide, permitted same to drift onto plaintiffs’ property, thereby injuring their growing crops, pecan trees, shade trees and ornamental shrubs.

In 1961 the Legislature enacted a statute of provision that it should be unlawful for any person to do business or engage in custom application…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. WhittenhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Swisher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Hart v. Starnes Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Durham v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Evans v. Boyle Flying Service, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wills v. Schroeder Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Short v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Dickinson Air Service, Inc. v. KadrmasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API