Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Downing
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 9, 1939No. 28652PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
R. E. Downing and R. E. Downing, Incorporated, filed an action in the lower court against Claude W. Garrett and W. J. B. Goodman, plaintiffs in error, to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien on an oil and gas lease.
From a judgment on the verdict and an order overruling a motion for a new trial, the latter appeal. The parties will he referred to as they appeared below.
About May 1, 1935, defendants completed a small oil well on a tract adjoining one on • which R. E. Downing, Inc., pumped three iiroducing wells. Defendants lacked pumping equipment, and on May 20th their pump was connected…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garmany v. LawtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Ambridge Borough v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Gaines v. Gaines Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Midland Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sautbine v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Barnett v. BodleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Dobry v. Yukon Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Nusbaum v. KnobbeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. PAYNESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.