Legal Opinion

Ambridge Borough v. Philadelphia Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1925No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

The Borough of Ambridge filed this bill in equity against the three defendants in which it prayed a decree requiring specific performance of their alleged duty to repair certain of its streets by repaving the same between the street railway tracks therein and one foot on the outside thereof, conformably to the provisions of an ordinance of the borough, and further, should there be a default in compliance with the decree for specific per^ formance, that an injunction be granted restraining defendants from the operation of street railway lines within the borough.

Th…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. United States v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Callery's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. James E. McFadden, Inc. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Meitner v. State Real Estate CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Unger v. Edgewood GarageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Garrett v. DowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API