Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Bodley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 29, 1959No. 38416PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendant, Barnett Tank Line, Inc., a corporation, for the collection of two promissory notes and foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. Defendant filed its answer and cross petition and an application to make Manganese Industries, Inc., an additional party defendant. In this application defendant alleged the plaintiffs were the organizers and incorporators of Manganese Industries, Inc., and it was a necessary and indispensable party to the action.

Manganese Industries, Inc., filed its waiver of the issuance and service of summons, entered…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Bentley v. Zelma Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Gibson v. FerrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Methvin v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. In Re Longhorn Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Tulsa Rock Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Arizona Real Estate Department v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Mainord v. SharpCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API