Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Riggs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 4, 1927No. 17178PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was instituted in ' the district court of Woodward county by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against defendants in error, as defendants, to recover the sum of $1,090.30.

Upon the trial of the case default judgment was rendered against the defendant W. C. Riggs, and judgment was rendered in favor of the other defendants, Vansickle and Hornbeck, and against the plaintiff.

The record discloses that the defendant W. C. Riggs had formerly entered into a contract with the AV. T. Rawleigh Company, plaintiff, whereby the said Riggs was i» sell certain wares and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Niles v. Citizens Nat. Bank of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Temple v. DuggerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Bilby v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Haley v. WyteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Clark v. SloanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Garrett v. DowningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API