Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Mann

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1970No. 7019SC422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

The record does not reveal any motion made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. However, at oral argument counsel entered into a written stipulation, filed as a part of the record, that this Court consider the motion made as a motion for directed verdict. The grounds therefor are set out in the judgment, to wit, “that the plaintiff offered no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant and, even if there were such evidence, the plaintiff’s evidence disclosed contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.”

On appeal from the granting of a motion for directed verdict, we must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Musgrave v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. MattoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barringer v. WeathingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Naylor v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Van Brooks v. BoucherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Adler v. Lumber Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API