Legal Opinion

Van Brooks v. Boucher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1974No. 7429SC477PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

When defendant moves for a directed verdict, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Anderson v. Butler, 284 N.C. 723, 202 S.E. 2d 585; Homes, Inc. v. Bryson, 273 N.C. 84, 159 S.E. 2d 329. Considered in this manner, the evidence in this case tends to show the following: Higgins Cafe is located on the south side of Main Street, which runs east and west in the town of Spindale. Oak Street intersects with Main Street at a point 120 to 145 feet east of Higgins Cafe. On 16 February 1968, plaintiff was fourteen years old. He and a group of other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Anderson v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Garmon v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Price v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Arnold Hashtani v. Duke Power Company, a Corporation of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  3. Brooks v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Brooks v. BoucherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Whitley v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API