Van Brooks v. Boucher
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
When defendant moves for a directed verdict, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Anderson v. Butler, 284 N.C. 723, 202 S.E. 2d 585; Homes, Inc. v. Bryson, 273 N.C. 84, 159 S.E. 2d 329. Considered in this manner, the evidence in this case tends to show the following: Higgins Cafe is located on the south side of Main Street, which runs east and west in the town of Spindale. Oak Street intersects with Main Street at a point 120 to 145 feet east of Higgins Cafe. On 16 February 1968, plaintiff was fourteen years old. He and a group of other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Anderson v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Garmon v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Price v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Arnold Hashtani v. Duke Power Company, a Corporation of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Brooks v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Brooks v. BoucherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Whitley v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.