Naylor v. Naylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence; she contends that her evidence did not show her to be contributorily negligent as a matter of law. We agree with this contention.
On appeal from the granting of a motion for directed verdict under Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Oivil Procedure, we must determine the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence guided by the same principles applicable in determining the sufficiency of evidence to withstand the former motion for nonsuit under G.S. 1-183.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Bell v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Anderson v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Beam v. ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- Libby Hill Seafood Restaurants, Inc. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Johnson v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Eatman v. BunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Stanley v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Moore v. Bobby Dixon Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.