Legal Opinion
State v. McLamb
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 17, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0329PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
Gerald J. “Jack” McLamb (“defendant”) appeals from a judgment of the Maricopa County Superior Court affirming his conviction in the City of Phoenix Municipal Court for a violation of Phoenix City Code (“Code”) section 23-21 proscribing the unauthorized wearing of the official insignia of the Phoenix Police Department. We have jurisdiction to determine the facial validity of this ordinance. Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 22- 375. Because we find that the ordinance is valid, the judgment of the superior court is affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts essential to…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Sult v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.