Legal Opinion
State v. Watson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 3, 2000No. 1 CA-CR 99-0342PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULT, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant Verne L. Watson appeals the Maricopa County Superior Court’s affir-mance of his Phoenix Municipal Court conviction for a violation of the City of Phoenix’s “Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance” arising out of the condition of defendant’s premises. Defendant appeals pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 22-375 (1990), alleging the unconstitutionality of the ordinance. Because we find that the ordinance is constitutional on its face, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In October 1998, defendant was tried in Phoenix Municipal Court for a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Standhardt v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- City of Fargo v. SalsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.