Linn County Bank v. Hopkins
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Linn District Court. Action by the Linn County Bank against Hopkins, to recover upon three promissory notes. March 22,1889, a motion to discharge plaintiff's attachment was granted, and it brings error. The opinion states the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C.:
The Linn County Bank sued A. T. Hopkins upon three promissory notes, and at the same time caused an attachment to be levied upon the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter and the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 21, in township 19, of range 24 east. A motion was made to discharge the attachment, on the ground that the 80 acres was exempt from forced sale for the reason that it was a homestead. The motion was sustained. The question, as stated by counsel for defendant in error, is whether all of the real estate attached at the instance of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Randal v. ElderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Coy v. CoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Hill v. BaconIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wild v. People ex rel. StephensIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- McCray v. Miller &8212 Bland v. BlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Brixius v. ReimringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Oregon Mtg. Co., Ltd. v. DunbarMontana Supreme Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.