Kirman v. Borzage

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

Plaintiffs are disappointed in the amount of their judgment; they sued for the principal sum of $3,679.61 and have appealed because they claim that the judgment which was entered, one for $2,000, is for a sum less than that required by the evidence. The defendant also has ap pealed, her contention being that it was error to render judgment in the plaintiffs’ favor for any amount. We find ourselves in agreement with defendant’s contention.

Plaintiffs alleged and proved that they were a copartnership, engaged in the plumbing business. They alleged and proved that on the 3rd…