State ex rel. Jones v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Application to the supreme court for a writ of mandamus requiring the district court for Hennepin county and the judges thereof to remand to Roseau county the case of Thomas L. Lawson and another against the Minnesota & Manitoba Railroad Company, previously removed to Hennepin county upon demaqd of defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus shall not issue commanding the district court ,of Hennepin county, and the judges thereof, to remand the case of Thomas L. Jones and Thomas Lawson, copartners as Jones & Lawson, plaintiffs, against the Minnesota & Manitoba Railroad Company, defendant, to the district court of the county of Roseau.
From the complaint it appears the original action was in claim and delivery to recover from the defendant a large number of railroad ties alleged to have been owned by and in possession of the plaintiffs in Roseau county on March 26, 1900. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Chadbourne v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. Child v. District Court of Chippewa CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Carpenter v. ComfortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
3Cited by3 opinions
- Healy v. MathewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State ex rel. Hilton v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Hubbard Milling Co. v. GroverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915