Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Comfort
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 14, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Benton county, McKelvey, J., presiding, denying their motion for change of place of trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial. Such an order does not involve the merits of the action, or any part thereof, under Gen. St. ch. 86, § 8. If reviewable at all, it must *540be upon an appeal from tbe judgment, (or perhaps from an ■order denying a new trial,) as an order affecting the judgment.
Appeal dismissed.1
The rule in this case was followed in Benton v. Flynn, decided April 26, 1876. Macdonald 4 Southworth, for appellants; Benton 4 Benton, for respondent.
2Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Schoch v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Winegar v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Allis v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.