Legal Opinion
Munn v. Mid-Continent Motor Securities Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 13, 1927No. 17225PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
This action was brought for the recovery of the sum of $4,-585.50 and attorneys’ fees, and costs.
Plaintiffs allege that, on the 6th day of April, 1920, they were indebted to defendant in the sum of $23,500, a balance due on seven promissory notes; that defendant agreed to extend payment of said balance, conditioned that plaintiffs execute five notes, four for $5,000 each and one for $3,500, all bearing 10 per cent, interest and due May 6, 1920, payable to one Paul R. Warner; that plaintiffs were not indebted to Warner, but executed the notes to him at the request of defendant,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Munn v. Mid-Continent Motor Securities Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Gray v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- R. P. Smith Sons & Co. v. Raines Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Stapleton Motor Sales Co. v. ColeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- D. W. L., Inc. v. Goodner-Van Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Lokan v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Pierce Petroleum Corp. v. HalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Spradlin v. American Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.