Legal Opinion
Sartain v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 11, 1916No. 7660PublishedCited by 35 opinions
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by W. P. Sartain against P. G. Walker, Jr., Fred H. Mott, Louis E. Hohman, and L. L. Hutchinson. Judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DAVIS, C.
The parties will be mentioned here as in the court below. This action was begun in the district court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, on November 5,1013, by the plaintiff filing ‘the following petition, omitting caption and mere formal parts :
“The plaintiff, W. P. Sartain, for his cause of action against the above-named defendants, states:
“That on the 2d day of April, 1913, he was the owner in fee of the southeast quarter (S. E. 1-4) of section fourteen (14), township fifteen (15) north, range fifteen (15) east, in Muskogee county, state of Oklahoma; that, being such owner at…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Neeley v. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Rennie v. Red Star Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Morris v. McLendonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- O'Neill v. LauderdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Munn v. Mid-Continent Motor Securities Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.