Legal Opinion

Eggers v. Ross

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1918No. 21,679PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Pottawatomie district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal concerns a question relating to the law of garnishment. The material facts are simple. A. B. Ross gave his brother, J. G. Ross, a chattel mortgage on a mare to secure an indebtedness of $150. By permission and consent of the mortgagee, the debtor sold the mare to one F. B. Leuty upon an understanding that the purchaser was to account to J. G. Ross for the purchase money.

*813Before Leuty paid over the money to the mortgagee and assignee of the purchase money, A. W. Eggers obtained a judgment against A. B. Ross and garnished the money…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. First National Bank v. SchuetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Rich v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Turner v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. InglittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Chatterton v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Kindig v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Lampl v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API