Legal Opinion

Kindig v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1921No. 22,884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Finney district court; CHARLES E. VANCE, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action to restrain the defendant sheriff from selling a half section of land in *219Finney county to satisfy a judgment against B. M. McCue, in whose name the record of titles disclosed a half interest.

McCue was a brother-in-law of plaintiff, and the evidence tended to show that in 1906 this half section and other lands were owned by one Jones and the plaintiff, and that in 1907 McCue acquired by conveyance the half interest of Jones. In 1908, by oral agreement between plaintiff and McCue, the latter was permitted to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Vaught v. PettyjohnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Franklin v. ColleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Eggers v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Turner v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Federal Trust Co. v. IrelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Rice v. RandolphSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Dannenberg v. TeetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API