Legal Opinion

Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Inglitt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1920No. 22,537PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton district court; Charles E. Vance, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

' The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiffs sold and shipped for delivery to the city of Syracuse two electrical transformers. The defendant, Roy W. Inglitt, who was then the superintendent of the city’s lighting system, had ordered the transformers without authority, and he received them from the railway carrier and unlawfully converted and sold them and pocketed the proceeds.

About the same time the city discovered that the defendant was short in his official accounts, and required him to make arrangements to settle. On November 5, 1918, he gave the city a warranty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Moore v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Byington v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Perkins v. Great Western Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Board of Education v. JacobusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Turner v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Andrews v. HeinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. H. & M. Tire Service Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Satanta State Bank v. McNabneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Axtell v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API