Legal Opinion

Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1916No. 19,850PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff, W, C. Hall, commenced this action on October 12, 1912, against The Kansas City Terra Cotta Company to recover on the defendant’s promissory note, and on the same day caused garnishment proceedings to be served on Albert Neville, a Coffeyville contractor. Neville, the garnishee, answered, and alleged that on July 26, 1912, he had entered into a written contract with the defendant, The Kansas City Terra Cotta Company, for certain materials to be delivered to him at Coffeyville on or before September 20, 1912. Other allegations…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Central Trust Co v. West India Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Niles v. Martin Mathusa & Hinckel Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Thayer v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. LSF FRANCHISE REO I, LLC v. Emporia Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Saylor v. CrookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Carson v. Chevron Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  4. Commodore v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API