Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Schuetz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1918No. 21,560PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Brown district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*230The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiff brought suit against Will Schuetz to recover on two promissory notes. The petition was filed on the 26th of February, 1917. Garnishee summons was issued to the Farmers State Bank of Germantown, which answered that it had on deposit to the credit of Will Schuetz the sum of $1,317.80. Intervening petitions were filed by parties claiming an interest in the fund. Among these John Schuetz, the father of Will Schuetz, claimed to be entitled to the fund for .the reason that he was a partner of his son, and that the fund is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Warren v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Farley, Spear & Co. v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Rich v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gaynes v. WallingfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Gottesman v. ToubinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. LemleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Eggers v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Plains State Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API