Legal Opinion

Burman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 19, 2007No. 06-871 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge.

Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the United States Court of Federal Claims, arguing that this Court lacks the subject matter jurisdiction to hear the Plaintiffs Complaint.1 Plaintiffs Complaint stems from an incident on May 22, 2001 at 2:00 a.m. where the plaintiff was arrested by Federal and local law enforcement officers following a traffic stop. The law enforcement officers arrested Plaintiff and allegedly “never advised him of his rights.” Compl. 2. When Plaintiff asked “what’s this all about?,” the arresting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Cosma-Nelms v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Burman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trafny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Reid v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Mendiola v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API