Legal Opinion
Mendiola v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 6, 2016No. 15-999CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; RCFC 12(b)(1); Federal Criminal Code; Federal Tort Claims Act; 42 U.S.C. $1983;. Sixth Amendment: Eighth Amendment
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
On September 9, 2015, plaintiff in the above-captioned case, appearing pro se, filed a complaint alleging assault and battery, tor-tee, theft, and embezzlement. That same day, plaintiff tiled a motion for leave to proceed in forma, pauperis (“IFP”). On September 30, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a jury trial, which was subsequently denied by this court on October 1, 2015. On November 6, 2015, defendant filed a motion to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Feist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020