Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 26, 2011No. 11-467 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Chief Judge.
Before the coui’t is plaintiffs Complaint (Compl.), Docket Number 1, filed July 18, 20ll.1 Pro se plaintiff Richard R. Smith (plaintiff or Mr. Smith) appears to allege that in 1996 a police officer employed by the Holbrook Police Department in Holbrook, Arizona accidentally shot him, which has resulted in on-going medical problems. See Compl. 1. Mr. Smith’s Complaint states, in its entirety:
3/25/20112
To Whom It May Concern:
In 1996 I was visiting Arizona and was chased in my car by a police officer. The officer shot through the windshield at me and I lost control of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gloria Treviño, Individually and as Next Friend for Robert Rodriguez Treviño v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Al-Qaisi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Cato v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Charles v. Unites States of AmericaDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2019
- Jaye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.