Legal Opinion
Cosma-Nelms v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 17, 2006No. 05-1201CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*171 OPINION & ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge.
Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to the United States Court of Federal Claims Rule (RCFC) 12(b), arguing that this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear Plaintiffs complaint and additionally that Plaintiffs complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has filed numerous documents, none of which are a clear response to Defendant’s motion. However, the court shall construe the document received on March 23, 2006 titled “Posh-Trial Minimized Damage and Property Loss” as Plaintiffs Response to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Riles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Trafny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Jumah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Burman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.