Legal Opinion
Park v. Trustees of the 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 15, 2005No. 04 Civ. 5228(JGK)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
This action is brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., by plaintiffs Uon Suk Park (“Mr.Park”) and John Sullivan (“Sullivan”), in his capacity as the Administrator of the Estate of Sallie Ann Park (the “Estate”) against defendants The Trustees of the 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund (the “Fund”). 1 The Second Amended Complaint states the following six claims: (1) the defendants allegedly failed to provide the Estate with a statement of the total benefits accrued and the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Derienzo v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Benjamin v. Oxford Health Ins., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Bulovic v. BothDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.