Legal Opinion

Young v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 2, 1996No. 14621-9-IIIPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

After reviewing a Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals decision affirming a Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) order, the Spokane County Superior Court reversed Pauline Young’s award of permanent partial disability. The court ordered Ms. Young’s employer, Sisters of Charity of Providence, to pay Ms. Young pension benefits for permanent total disability. Sisters appeals, contending: (1) the court erred in applying the attending physician rule, (2) certain of the court’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence, and (3) the findings do not support the court’s conclusion that Ms.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hamilton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Petersen v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. CarradoWashington Supreme Court · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rogers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Rogers v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Gorre v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2015

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API