Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 6, 2009No. 62544-6-IPublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 Following an on-the-job injury, Lisa Rogers requested that the Department of Labor and Indus*176tries (Department) authorize payment for spinal fusion surgery. The Department denied this request, concluding that the surgery was unlikely to be successful. Rogers did not challenge the Department’s determination but, instead, proceeded with the surgery without authorization. The surgery was unsuccessful. Rogers nonetheless sought reimbursement from the Department, contending that the surgery constituted “proper and necessary” medical care under the Industrial Insurance Act.1 The Department denied…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Barrie v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Watson v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Watson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Birgen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Department of Labor & Industries v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Gorre v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API