Flanigan v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
In these two consolidated cases we review conflicting decisions from different divisions of the Court of Appeals. In each case, the spouse of a worker killed on the job obtained workers’ compensation benefits and also recovered damages for loss of consortium in a suit against a third party. The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) claimed a portion of each third party recovery as reimbursement for the workers’ compensation benefits it had paid.
We hold the Department’s right to reimbursement does not extend to a spouse’s third party recovery for loss of consortium. We affirm the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Brand v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.