Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nicholson v. Copperweld Steel Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1996No. 1994-2352PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Two questions are presented for our review: (1) Is mandamus available to compel payment, pursuant to R.C. 4123.60, to a decedent’s spouse of the PTD the decedent could have received prior to his death? and (2) Did the commission abuse its discretion in finding that Charles was not entitled to PTD and denying Marian the payments available under R.C. 4123.60? For the reasons that follow, we hold that R.C. 4123.60 affords dependents, upon timely application, the right to claim compensation for which a decedent was eligible but was not paid before death and that mandamus is available to enforce…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Nyitray v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Conley-Slowinski v. Superior Spinning & Stamping Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Yancey v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Byk v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API