Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reliance Electric Co. v. Wright

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2001No. 99-2110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The relevant facts in this case are undisputed. Claimant-appellee, Glen C. Wright, began employment as a core maker for appellant, Reliance Electric Company (“Reliance”) in 1952. He continued in that capacity until the plant at which he was working closed in December 1986. Wright then received unemployment compensation for six months following his layoff, after which he took a regular (nondisability) pension from Reliance at age fifty-nine. In 1987, Wright also applied for Social Security disability benefits, which were granted and paid from June 3, 1988, until Wright reached the age of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Galion Manufacturing Division v. HaygoodOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jacobs v. Teledyne, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Navistar, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State Ex Rel. Cliff v. Auburndale Co., Unpublished Decision (8-4-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Reliance Elec. Co. v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Kitts v. Mancan, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Kitts v. Mancan, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API