Legal Opinion

Hayduk v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 2006No. 230 C.D. 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

Edward Hayduk (Claimant) petitions for review from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) in part and affirmed in part. The Board reversed that portion of the WCJ’s order that granted Claimant’s claim petition and awarded costs related to the claim petition. The Board affirmed that portion of the order that Bemis Co., Inc. (Employer) presented a reasonable contest.

Claimant worked twenty-seven years as a maintenance mechanic at a plant that manufactured plastic wrappers for bakery…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Continental Insurance v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Jones v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. USX Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. McClure v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Reyes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API