Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Schneider, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 2005No. 23 WAP 2003PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NIGRO.

We granted allowance of appeal in this secured transactions case to determine whether the Superior Court erred in finding that a successor business entity could be held liable on a theory of successor liability to a general creditor of its predecessor entity, even though the successor purchased the predecessor’s assets from the predecessor’s secured creditors at foreclosure sale pursuant to the Pennsylvania Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”). For the following reasons, we hold that the Superior Court did not err and therefore affirm.

From 1984 through 1990, Appellee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Sphere Drake Insurance v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Koken v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Johnson v. American StandardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Bayer Corp. v. DX Terminals, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API