Legal Opinion

Figueiredo v. Rent Control Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 16, 1988No. 87-1240PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is an appeal by the rent control board of Cambridge (board) and tenants from a judgment of the Superior Court which determined that the twelve rental units owned by the plaintiff at 9 Magazine Street (property) are not subject to St. 1976, c. 36, the Cambridge rent control act (Act).

We recite the undisputed relevant facts. For many years, the property, a three-story building, had been operated as a thirty-three room rooming house with shared bathroom facilities. In 1975, the then owner was given permission by the Cambridge board of zoning appeal to convert the property *662to thirteen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Amari v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Polednak v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Elma Realty Co. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  4. Rent Control Bd. of Cambridge v. Cambridge Tower Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Chicago Title Insurance v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fire Chief v. State Building Code Appeals BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  2. Zuker v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API