Legal Opinion

Zuker v. City of Cambridge

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 16, 1990No. 89-P-419PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

This appeal concerns the right of a Cambridge landlord to make optional repairs to a vacant controlled rental unit without first obtaining a removal permit from the Cambridge rent control board (board).

*385To further the purposes of the Cambridge Rent Control Act, St. 1976, c. 36, the city adopted § 1 of c. 23 of the Cambridge City Code, Ordinance 966, to regulate the removal of controlled rental units from the housing market. The ordinance requires a landlord to obtain a permit from the board, after a hearing, before removing a rent controlled unit from the housing market. In addition to such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Manning v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Zussman v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Mayo v. Boston Rent Control AdministratorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Polednak v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API