Rent Control Bd. of Cambridge v. Cambridge Tower Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
Under a special act authorizing the regulation of maximum rents of “controlled rental units” in the city of Cambridge, “rental units [as to] which a governmental unit, agency, or authority . . . regulates the rents” are excluded from the definition of “controlled rental units.” St. 1976, c. 36, § 3 (b) (3) (ii). A Cambridge ordinance concerning the removal from the market of controlled rental units, as defined in the rent control act, provides that such units may not be removed from the rental market (e.g., converted to a cooperative) unless the rent control board of Cambridge (board) grants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Fiorentino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Daughters of Miriam Center for the Aged v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Figueiredo v. Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Rent Control Board of Cambridge v. Cambridge Tower Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Rent Control Board v. 375 Associates Ltd. PartnershipMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Slade v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Amherst Associates v. Amherst Housing Review BoardMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.