Legal Opinion
Amari v. Rent Control Board of Cambridge
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided February 12, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
This is an appeal by the owner from a judgment of the Superior Court which declared that unit 3 at 69 Harvey Street is a controlled rental unit subject to St. 1976, c. 36, the Cambridge Rent Control Act (Act). 2
On February 12, 1982, Barnett Rubenstein (tenant) filed a tenant’s complaint with the rent control board of Cambridge (board), alleging, in substance, that unit 3 was a controlled rental unit, that it had not been properly registered as such, and that as a result Rubenstein had paid subtantially more than the legal maximum rent. The matter was heard by a board hearing examiner, and she…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- School Committee of Springfield v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Sherman v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Kenney v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Niles v. Boston Rent Control AdministratorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Dwyer v. PiccicutoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- RENT CONTROL BOARD OF CAMBRIDGE v. PraughtMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Slavin v. Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Kline v. Shearwater Ass'nMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.